Attack Surface Mapping
Entry points, authentication routes, exposed endpoints, public assets, sensitive flows, and cloud-facing interfaces.
VAPT
Citual performs scoped vulnerability assessment and penetration testing for web apps, APIs, authentication flows, authorization controls, business logic, and cloud-connected surfaces.
Delivery map
What we clarify before execution
Define scope, rules of engagement, test windows, exclusions, and communication paths.
Test high-risk application areas using manual review, tooling, evidence capture, and business-flow analysis.
Report findings with severity, reproduction, business impact, remediation guidance, and retest options.
Service coverage
Testing is tailored to the application and risk context. Not every checklist item is relevant, but the evidence should always be clear.
Entry points, authentication routes, exposed endpoints, public assets, sensitive flows, and cloud-facing interfaces.
Login, reset, session handling, role boundaries, privilege escalation, object access, and tenant isolation checks.
Injection, XSS, CSRF, file handling, rate limits, workflow abuse, payment or approval bypass, and sensitive data exposure.
Security headers, storage exposure, environment leaks, debug settings, CORS, transport security, and deployment hygiene.
Screenshots, affected endpoints, reproduction steps, risk explanation, affected roles, and remediation hints.
Retesting of agreed critical fixes with updated status and residual-risk notes.
How we work
The point is not to produce a long document and disappear. We map the operating reality, show the evidence, and turn it into a sequence your team can execute.
Agree scope, access, test accounts, data handling, safety limits, and escalation contacts.
Run discovery, manual testing, targeted tooling, and business-flow abuse checks.
Validate findings to reduce noise and explain the business impact clearly.
Review the report with engineering and leadership, then retest agreed remediations.
What the buyer sees
Each engagement should leave the business with fewer unknowns, better prioritisation, and enough documentation to act without confusion.
Executive summary.
Technical findings.
Reproduction steps.
Severity and business impact.
Fix recommendations.
Retest status where agreed.
Decision layer
A useful VAPT report does not stop at naming vulnerabilities. It shows where the issue exists, why it matters, how to reproduce it safely, and what the engineering team should change.
Research-backed thinking
OWASP WSTG is used as a reference for web application testing categories and evidence-oriented testing structure.
View referenceValidated findings and reproducible proof help teams act faster and reduce remediation confusion.
Critical findings should move through owner, fix, validation, and closure states.
Next step
We will clarify scope, evidence, effort, and priority before recommending a larger implementation.